Skip to main content
Bus Rapid Transit in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Tier 2

Tier 2 indicators report aggregate results of outputs and outcomes that are directly attributable to IDA interventions achieved during the IDA20 cycle. There are 33 indicators organized under IDA20's Special Themes and Cross-cutting Issues, as well as the standalone category Delivering Outcomes.

IDA20 SPECIAL THEMES

CLIMATE CHANGE

CLIMATE CHANGE

Generation capacity of renewable energy (Gigawatt)

4.67GIGAWATT
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
0.19 (FY23)
Benchmark
4.0 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
10 (FY23-25)
CLIMATE CHANGE

Generation capacity of renewable energy (Gigawatt)

The indicator measures in gigawatts (GW) the generation capacity of renewable energy facilities to be enabled with direct, indirect, and/or enabling policy support through the World Bank’s operations in IDA-eligible countries (including IDA-blend). Data is reported based on target values or projected results for assumed successful project completion as reported at the time of project approval, covering Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees.

Renewable energy refers to electricity or heat from renewable sources, namely: the sun (solar photovoltaic, concentrated solar, solar water heater), wind; water (hydropower, wave, tidal); combustion of organic matter from sustainable sources (bioenergy); or thermal potential of the earth (geothermal). This covers grid, off-grid, bulk, and distributed sources.

CLIMATE CHANGE

Net GHG emissions (tCO2eq/year, millions)

-20.52MILLION TCO2EQ/YEAR
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
-13.41 (FY23)
Benchmark
-29.06 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
Monitored
CLIMATE CHANGE

Net GHG emissions (tCO2eq/year, millions)

Project level net (also termed as relative) GHG emissions are typically calculated as an annual average of the difference between emissions expected to be generated by project activities aggregated over the economic lifetime of the project and the emissions of a baseline (counterfactual) scenario aggregated over the same time horizon. The indicator applies to operations that are subject to GHG accounting under the corporate mandate. This includes IBRD/IDA investment lending in Sustainable Development and Infrastructure Practice Groups covering key economic sectors (Energy and Extractives; Transport; Environment, Natural Resources and Blue Economy; Urban, Resilience and Land; Water; and Agriculture and Food) where World Bank-approved GHG accounting methodologies and tools exist. The indicator is based on an ex-ante estimation performed during project preparation using Bank approved methodologies and tools. The indicator value is negative if the project is reducing or sequestering emissions, and positive if the project is increasing emissions. Net GHG emissions is calculated as an aggregate of the net emissions of projects delivered in the FY. If the project undergoes major restructuring or is subject to additional financing relevant to GHG accounting, the ex-ante estimation of project net emissions needs to be recalculated at the time of restructuring or processing additional financing. Net GHG emissions are reported for entire projects regardless of the share of IBRD or IDA financing.

CLIMATE CHANGE

People provided with access to clean cooking (million)

4.08MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
2.50 (FY23)
Benchmark
-
Performance Standard
20 (FY23-25)
CLIMATE CHANGE

People provided with access to clean cooking (million)

This indicator measures the number of people who are expected to gain access to new and improved cooking services through the World Bank’s operations in IDA-eligible countries (including IDA-blend). Data is reported based on target values or projected results for assumed successful project completion as reported at the time of project approval, covering Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees.

FRAGILITY, CONFLICT AND VIOLENCE

FRAGILITY, CONFLICT, AND VIOLENCE

IDA FCS supported in building capacity to use digital tools for collection and analysis of geo-tagged data

17COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Benchmark
14 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
18 (FY23-35)
FRAGILITY, CONFLICT, AND VIOLENCE

IDA FCS supported in building capacity to use digital tools for collection and analysis of geo-tagged data

Indicator tracks progress on building capacity of IDA/FCS clients as well as partners, and World Bank teams on the ground, to leverage field-appropriate technology for digital data collection and analysis for enhanced monitoring, supervision and accountability of World Bank-funded projects and within government systems. This indicator considers capacity-building as a programmatic approach to enhance M&E and supervision across projects through client-oriented methods such as the innovative Geo-Enabling initiative for Monitoring and Supervision (GEMS) to systematically enhance monitoring and evaluation (M&E) as well as supervision in FCV settings. 

JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

Farmers adopting improved agricultural technology (million)

2.63MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
0.59 (FY23)
Female Beneficiaries
1.06 (FY23)
Benchmark
2.42 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
6.5-7.0 (FY23-25)
JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

Farmers adopting improved agricultural technology (million)

This indicator measures the number of farmers of the project who have adopted an improved agricultural technology promoted by operations funded by IDA. Data are reported for Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees unless otherwise specified.

·       Farmers are people engaged in farming activities or members of a farming business (disaggregated by men and women) targeted by the project.

·       Adoption refers to a change of practice or change in use of a technology that was introduced/promoted by the project.

·       Technology includes a change in practices compared to currently used practices or technologies (seed preparation, planting time, feeding schedule, feeding ingredients, postharvest storage/processing, and so on). If the project introduces or promotes a technology package in which the benefit depends on the application of the entire package (such as, a combination of inputs such as a new variety and advice on agronomic practices such as soil preparation, changes in seeding time, fertilizer schedule, plant protection, and so on), this counts as one technology.

Source: Bank Guidance on Corporate Results Indicators

JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

Area provided with new/improved irrigation or drainage services (Hectares, million)

0.24MILLION HA
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
0.04 (FY23)
Benchmark
0.82 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
1.5-2.0 (FY23-25)
JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

Area provided with new/improved irrigation or drainage services (Hectares, million)

This Corporate Result Indicator (CRI) measures in hectares the total area of land provided with new or improved irrigation or drainage services in operations funded by IDA. This includes:

        (i) The area provided with new irrigation or drainage services (hectare), and

        (ii) The area provided with improved irrigation or drainage services (hectare)

Data are reported for Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees, unless otherwise specified.

·       Irrigation or drainage services refers to the better delivery of water to, and drainage of water from, arable land, including better timing, quantity, quality, and cost-effectiveness for the water users.

·       New irrigation or drainage services refers to the provision of irrigation and drainage services in an area that has not had these services before. The area is not necessarily newly cropped or newly productive land, but is newly provided with irrigation and drainage services, and may have been rain-fed land before.

·       Improved irrigation or drainage services refers to the upgrading, rehabilitation, and/or modernization of irrigation or drainage services in an area with existing irrigation and drainage services.

Source: Bank Guidance on Corporate Results Indicators

JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

People provided with new or improved electricity service (million)

10.83MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
6.48 (FY23)
Benchmark
24.35 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
35-50 (FY23-25)
JOBS AND ECONOMIC TRANSFORMATION

People provided with new or improved electricity service (million)

The indicator measures the number of people that have received new or improved electricity service through the World Bank’s operations in IDA-eligible countries (including IDA-blend). This includes estimates of direct access, inferred access, and improved service. Data is reported based on actual results achieved in a referenced fiscal year, covering Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees.

The indicator is a composite of the following estimates:

  • Direct access measures the number of people in households previously lacking electricity service that benefited from the new grid or off-grid service. This measure is based on operations’ results reports for household electricity access.
  • Inferred access measures the number of people in households previously lacking electricity service that are likely to have benefited from new services made possible as an indirect result of investments that increased the availability of electricity in the grid in the given country.
  • Improved service measures the number of people in households with pre-existing grid service that are likely to have benefited from attaining a higher tier of electricity service under the Multi-Tier Framework for Energy Access (mtfenergyaccess.esmap.org).

HUMAN CAPITAL

HUMAN CAPITAL

Beneficiaries of social safety net programs (million)

23.88MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
3.11 (FY23)
Female Beneficiaries
12.94 (FY23)
Benchmark
170.1 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
75-375 (FY23-25)
HUMAN CAPITAL

Beneficiaries of social safety net programs (million)

This indicator measures the number of individuals benefiting from safety nets programs supported by IDA. Safety nets programs are designed to provide social assistance to poor and vulnerable individuals or families by including them in cash transfers (conditional and unconditional), public works and workfare programs, fee waivers for services, and in-kind assistance to address critical needs (such as, food, medicine, shelter, and social services). Data are reported for Investment Project Financing, Development Project Financing, Program-for-Results, and Guarantees, unless otherwise specified.

HUMAN CAPITAL

People who have received essential health, nutrition, and population services (million)

72.13MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
50.67 (FY23)
Female Beneficiaries
48.56 (FY23)
Benchmark
210.36 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
285-430 (FY23-25)
HUMAN CAPITAL

People who have received essential health, nutrition, and population services (million)

The indicator measures the sum of the number of children immunized, the number of women and children who received basic nutrition services, and the number of deliveries attended by skilled health personnel, through operations funded by IDA. Data are reported for Investment Project Financing and Program-for-Results.

HUMAN CAPITAL

Children immunized (million)

20.76MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
13.81 (FY23)
Female Beneficiaries
10.38 (FY23)
Benchmark
76.10 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
105-200 (FY23-25)
HUMAN CAPITAL

Children immunized (million)

Number of children immunized: Refers to the number of children 5 years of age and younger receiving vaccines purchased through an IDA- financed project, as well as the number of children immunized with vaccines purchased with other resources (that is, GAVI or government funds) that are delivered through an IDA-supported program. It captures the number of children immunized and not the number of vaccinations; that is, if the same child is immunized with multiple vaccines on the same day or has several immunization visits in a given year, the child will be counted only once. Thus, simply tallying the monthly totals of the number of vaccines delivered to children as recorded in immunization registers or health management information systems, will lead to double counting. Since contribution rather than attribution is to be measured, pro-rating based on proportion of IDA financing is not required.

IDA20 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES

DEBT

DEBT

IDA countries publishing annual and timely public debt reports (number)

35COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
10 (FY23)
Benchmark
41 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
30-35 (FY23-25)
DEBT

IDA countries publishing annual and timely public debt reports (number)

IDA countries that publish public debt reports at least on an annual basis providing information on the outstanding external and domestic public sector debt portfolio and its main cost and risk characteristics, with data that is not older than 6 months.

 

GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONS

GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONS

IDA countries provided with statistical capacity building support for the implementation of household surveys

50COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
16 (FY23)
Benchmark
54 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
55 (FY23-25)
GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONS

IDA countries provided with statistical capacity building support for the implementation of household surveys

Technical assistance activity provided to national statistical agencies related to household surveys used for official welfare and/or poverty measurement (such as, sampling, questionnaire review, data collection, field logistics, data management, dissemination, and estimation of poverty-lines). Data are reported for IDA eligible countries, including blend countries. Data is reported cumulatively, without double counting countries, starting from the first year of the IDA20 cycle.

 

GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONS

Countries collecting disability data with IDA support

29COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
8 (FY23)
Performance Standard
Monitored
GOVERNANCE AND INSTITUTIONS

Countries collecting disability data with IDA support

Number of countries conducting household surveys for IDA countries[1] collecting the Washington Group Short Set (WGSS) for disability questions in their survey used for measuring welfare and poverty

[1]  https://www.washingtongroup-disability.com/fileadmin/uploads/wg/Washington_Group_Questionnaire__1_-_WG_Short_Set_on_Functioning__October_2022_.pdf

 

TECHNOLOGY

TECHNOLOGY

People provided with enhanced access to broadband internet (million)

66.86MILLION
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
42.25 (FY23)
Benchmark
47.10 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
80-88 (FY23-25)
TECHNOLOGY

People provided with enhanced access to broadband internet (million)

The indicator measures the number of people who have benefitted from new or enhanced access to broadband internet service during the project implementation period.

  • New access is defined as the number of beneficiaries (people) that have gained new access to internet service.
  • Enhanced access is defined as the number of people that have benefitted from improved Internet service. Enhanced access refers to improved download and upload speeds, better quality through lower latency and jitter as well as lower prices for data services and internet-enabled devices.

Internet use can be through fixed or mobile broadband networks and can be at any location of Internet access (such as, home, work, school, internet cafés, public places). Depending on project focus, data on mobile and/or fixed subscribers is used to calculate internet users.

CRISIS PREPAREDNESS

CRISIS PREPAREDNESS

Countries supported toward institutionalizing disaster risk reduction as a national priority with IDA support

48COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
17 (FY23)
Benchmark
62 (FY21-22)
Performance Standard
55-70 (FY23-25)
CRISIS PREPAREDNESS

Countries supported toward institutionalizing disaster risk reduction as a national priority with IDA support

This indicator reports the number of IDA countries supported by active IDA-funded operations that have contributed to the institutionalization of disaster risk management (DRM). A contribution-based approach is used to ascertain the World Bank’s support to institutionalizing DRM at the national and local levels, in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 priorities for action. These include: i) Understanding disaster risk, ii) Strengthening disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk, iii) Investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience and iv) Enhancing disaster preparedness for effective response, and to “Build Back Better” in recovery, rehabilitation, and reconstruction.

CRISIS PREPAREDNESS

Countries integrating adaptive social protection into national systems with IDA support

17COUNTRIES
(FY23)
Actual in FCS
3 (FY23)
Performance Standard
Monitored
CRISIS PREPAREDNESS

Countries integrating adaptive social protection into national systems with IDA support

Adaptive Social Protection Systems are systems which build resilience to and can respond to covariate shocks such as climate shocks. Such systems can build the resilience of households prior to a shock through the provision of cash transfers, productive inclusion activities, employment schemes, etc. They can also provide support to households who are negatively impacted by shocks to prevent them from falling into or deeper into poverty. Adaptive systems require functioning institutional arrangements and government leadership, strong financial systems, adaptable and flexible programs, and significant data on shocks but also households.

Delivering Outcomes

DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA Country Partnership Frameworks (%, IEG ratings, 4-year rolling)

68PERCENT
(FY20-23)
Actual in FCS
67 (FY20-23)
Benchmark
60 (FY19-22)
Performance Standard
70 (FY23-25)
DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA Country Partnership Frameworks (%, IEG ratings, 4-year rolling)

Percentage of Country Partnership Framework (CPF) Completion Reports rated moderately satisfactory, satisfactory, or highly satisfactory by Independent Evaluation Group (IEG). Data is reported for CPFs of IDA eligible countries, including blend countries, during CPF period.

DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA operations - as a share of commitments (%, IEG ratings, 3-year rolling)

87.4PERCENT
(FY20-22)
Actual in FCS
82.4 (FY20-22)
Benchmark
84.8 (FY19-21)
Performance Standard
80 (FY23-25)
DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA operations - as a share of commitments (%, IEG ratings, 3-year rolling)

Share of IDA operations and IDA commitments rated by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) as “moderately satisfactory” or higher on achievement of outcomes. Data are for projects exiting in the three previous fiscal years for which at least 60% of the projects for each fiscal year have been evaluated by IEG. The rating captures the extent to which a project’s original or formally revised development objectives were achieved. The rating is based on three criteria: (i) relevance of the objectives and design (relevance); (ii) extent to which the objectives were achieved (efficacy); and (iii) extent to which the operation achieves a higher rate of return than the opportunity cost of capital or is able to provide a similar economic justification (efficiency).

DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA operations - as a share of operations (%, IEG ratings, 3-year rolling)

80.20PERCENT
(FY20-22)
Actual in FCS
73.90 (FY20-22)
Benchmark
81.0 (FY19-21)
Performance Standard
75 (FY23-25)
DELIVERING OUTCOMES

Satisfactory outcomes of IDA operations - as a share of operations (%, IEG ratings, 3-year rolling)

Share of IDA operations and IDA commitments rated by the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) as “moderately satisfactory” or higher on achievement of outcomes. Data are for projects exiting in the three previous fiscal years for which at least 60% of the projects for each fiscal year have been evaluated by IEG. The rating captures the extent to which a project’s original or formally revised development objectives were achieved. The rating is based on three criteria: (i) relevance of the objectives and design (relevance); (ii) extent to which the objectives were achieved (efficacy); and (iii) extent to which the operation achieves a higher rate of return than the opportunity cost of capital or is able to provide a similar economic justification (efficiency).